Search:

<< >>
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

view by post / day / month

posts
the omen 9/29/2005
too many things 9/28/2005
slice of life 9/27/2005
weekend's on its way 9/23/2005
insignificant blatherings 9/21/2005
tunes and grub 9/20/2005
more fun with perl 9/19/2005
pete and bernie's philosophical steakhouse 9/19/2005
reality tv diatribe 9/14/2005
back to work, maggots 9/14/2005
parisian sketches 9/13/2005
the wrap-up 9/13/2005
back in america 9/12/2005
live from fqc&";net 9/3/2005
long time 9/2/2005

previous next
 
 
pete and bernie's philosophical steakhouse 11:45am 9/19/2005  

To start off, for those unfamiliar with the source of the reference in the post title, you need to check out Steve Coogan's hilariously inept talk show host Alan Partridge. Veronica and i picked up the DVD set of his fictitious BBC talk show Knowing Me Knowing You at Best Buy on Saturday. Alan insists on completely ABBA theme music, and greets guests by saying "Knowing me, Alan Partridge, knowing you, Ted Graves ... a ha.", to which i would be expected to give a polite "a ha" response. I refreshed my memory of a few of the episodes on Sunday afternoon, including his contractually-obligated episode from Paris in which he argues with his French co-host and guest that Peter Ustinov is the greatest living philosopher, and that he should open a steakhouse with famous restauranteur Bernie ... *someone* (ack, my quote knowledge is slipping). Also great is his short-lived public policy discussion with candidates for parliament, disrupted by the presence of Lieutenant Colonel Kojak Slaphead III of the Bald Brummies Against The Big Footed Conspiracy Party. Good stuff.

On Friday evening Bob popped by our place after a few days down in Monterey, and we grabbed dinner in San Mateo at Bombay Garden before catching the late showing of The 40-Year-Old Virgin. Quite good, very good-natured and lots of laugh-out-loud moments. I neglected to write that Veronica and i saw Wedding Crashers at the Metreon a week or two before we headed off to Europe. That nearly had me rolling in the aisles. A lot of wonderfully-concocted comedic bits. So that's two great comedies we've seen in recent months.

Veronica and Bob slept in a bit Saturday morning (we didn't get home from the movie until after 1am). I got up around 10am and tidied the kitchen and living room, and started the long process of washing all my laundry from the trip and before. I also managed to get out and buy some sundries. The bagel and Cocoa Pebbles i had upon returning kept me tided over until we got our act in gear and headed out of the house around 3:30pm. Bob was off to see friends in Santa Rosa for a few days, while V and i stopped off at Best Buy to get the aforementioned Alan Partridge DVD, as well as a few new PSP games (Death Jr. and Burnout Legends, which i literally had to convince the salesman that it existed), and a few Rock en Espanol cd's for Veronica. I haven't played Death Jr. yet, but Burnout keeps up the tradition of the excellent Burnout Takedown that introduced me to the series on the Xbox. Super fast, good controls, and some sweet visuals even on the petite PSP screen. How Nintendo expects the rapidly-aging Gameboy line to keep up is beyond me. They seem to have hedged their bets on hardware innovation (à la the DS's touch screen), but they are really failing to deliver any worthwhile titles. Their argument has always been quality over quantity, but they seem to be losing in comparisons to PS and Xbox software even in the quality department lately. The new Gameboy Micro appears to be a smaller Gameboy Advance with fewer buttons ... what problems does that solve? V and i watched a video of a press conference discussing the next-generation Nintendo console, code-named Revolution, demonstrating their new controller. It's intended to attract gamers put off by the complexity of today's controllers ... not a bad idea ... and looks like a remote control (usable with one hand), with a sort of Jeopardy!-buzzer thing usable by the other hand. It's motion-sensitive, and they showed footage of players using it as drumsticks, a baseball bat, a conductor's wand, and a sort of ... cattle prod to make Mario jump. I sum up the state of gaming as this: if Nintendo doesn't make an effort to get their games online and to challenge the technical superiority of Sony and Microsoft, they're going to be up s#@t creek.

After more shopping, we headed home, communed with the doggies for a few hours, then headed up to the city to meet up with Jenz at the evening's New Wave City vs. Popscene. The club was out in the boonies in the southern, industrial portion of San Francisco. We couldn't believe Jenz took the bus out there. Or that there was a bus that went out there. The club was fun ... i held my own aping Morrissey on the dance floor against more seasoned Moz impersonators, and V got to relive days of old in the gothic/industrial room dancing to Nitzer Ebb, Bauhaus, and Front 242. Told at the bar that the only beer available was Miller Lite, i made the tough decision to have a gin and tonic. I haven't drunk hard liquor in quite a while, ever since bad experiences with tequila and vodka shots in grad school. I felt distinctly weird after finishing that. I followed it up with a Campari and soda, made by someone who'd obviously never made the drink before as she mixed 90% Campari with only 10% soda. At 2:30am it dawned on me the club wasn't closing at the traditional 2am end of drinking, so we headed off the the Castro for a late-night meal at Sparky's. We didn't get back to our slumbering dogs until after 5am ... eek.

Sunday was therefore understandably spent mostly around the house recuperating. I did some more grocery shopping in anticipation of making a nice Sunday dinner, but that was shelved when Geoff and Naomi popped by on their way back from Santa Barbara. So we all convened to North Beach Pizza instead, before G and N continued their trek to San Francisco by way of Sacramento ... god knows when they got home. I'm planning on making dinner for Bob and V tonight, a hopefully successful experiment involving pasta and vegetables with chicken sauteed with basil. V's started a tennis class with one of her coworkers, so when she gets home there'll either be a yummy home-cooked meal or take-out and a garbage can full of an ill-fated culinary expedition waiting for her.

Chelsea continue to win, and attract the ire of the sporting press. This week Soccernet's "Team of the Week" is all Chelsea, and the text includes a conversation between Tedium and God where the latter has directed the former to take up residence in the Premiership. What a load of crap. Was everyone happier when Arsenal and Manchester United were the ones winning everything, year in year out? As the Soccernet Chelsea correspondent puts it: "Man U win the league 8 years out of 10 and everyone claps. Before that Liverpool dominate domestic football for 15 years and everyone claps. Arsenal go 49 games unbeaten and we all get to clap. Chelsea win the league and the Carling Cup once and the villagers light the torches and start running up the bloody hill." Our style of play, you say? I have to agree with Chelsea assistant coach Steve Clarke: "Ask our supporters if we're boring - I know exactly what they'd say." All in the eye of the beholder, i suppose. Anyhow, we are top of the table, the league's top scorers, and have yet to concede a goal. And we are still finding our feet.

I'm back in my friend's NFL pool this year, picking games every week and so far failing miserably. I think i'm picking winners based on my knowledge of football that is now three or four years old. What do you mean Green Bay is falling apart? Minnesota gets throttled by the freakin' Bengals??? What is this sport coming to?!?! As such, i don't expect to win much.

On the agenda this week is Bloc Party at the Warfield, and back to work generating funds for my lab.

last edited 11:26pm 5/1/2007 back to top

Matthew 3:12pm 9/19/2005
I guess the neutrals enjoy explosive attacking footy with clever intricate build play laced with flair and more importantly, goals and goal mouth action - so were generally more appreciative of the Arse/Man U dominance of the last 13yrs, then the low scoring dull affair's Chelsea's multi-million $ line-up are currently producing.

Damn those neutrals.

So, you decided on a date for SMFA, or a ya still running scared? ;o)

ted (www) 3:24pm 9/19/2005

I'm amused that Chelsea are termed "low scoring" when we lead the league in goals this season, and were second only to Arsenal last season. And it's not like the goals we score are all lobs down half the field to Drogba either. Lampard, Robben, and Duff have produced as many exciting spells of attacking football as Ronaldo/Rooney/van Nistelrooy or Reyes/Pires/Henry in the last 1.5 years. Wenger seems intent on using psychology to convince Mourinho that his tactics are "wrong", and to force a change that might give the Arse a better chance at finishing top. Well, he never succeeded in winning those games with Ferguson either. And as i recall Arsenal were grinding out more than their fair share of boring 1-nil wins during their unbeaten run.

Granted, we're not in top form but it will come as it did last season. I'm dismissive of this whole argument about Chelsea ruining football as a bunch of whining from those who begrudge Chelsea their success, for whatever reason. Argue money all you want, but as Mourinho put it "i'd be stupid not to play a certain style when i know my opponents can't cope with it".

Still examining my calendar/formulating excuses.

Matthew 4:48pm 9/19/2005
sure, but the high scoring is based on last season, as oppose to the first 2 months of last season which was a series of dull 1-0 wins - coinciding with the criticism. By the 2nd half of last season, everyone was, i think, quite happy with Chelsea. Again, they've started the season poorly, not creating many chances, and not scoring many goals - grinding out results from good defensive work in comparison to blinding attacking displays. So again, the negative criticism is leveled - as was the Arsenal Championship winning team under George Graham. I don't think there's some mindless anti-Chelsea conspiracy that's risen up, but teams at the top are there for a reason. When they perform, everyone oooo's, and when they don't everyone takes a shot at them. Chelsea are receiving criticism now because they are a top team now - which is new for them. Nobody cares when a mid or lower table team plays badly - it's expected :o)

The 2nd half of last season, Chelsea won all the plaudits they could want. But, when a team made up of top internationals plays slow unimaginative football creating few chances, they will receive plenty of criticism, irrespective of the result. Which is what’s happening now. Ultimately, people watch professional sport to be entertained, winning and entertaining are not the same thing. I don't think you'd find too many people who'd claim Chelsea are not winning. Based on current form, the neutral is going to be more inclined to want to watch Man Utd or Arse, etc.

I'm sure when Chelsea kick in to gear, and start playing some decent stuff, the criticism will level off. But until then, it's open season :o)


ted (www) 4:54pm 9/19/2005
Granted. I have my disagreements but i'll put them on ice as i do have a small bias. One thing ... the high scoring applies to this season too, where we've scored the most goals of anyone so far (12 over 6 matches).

Matthew 5:45pm 9/19/2005
right, but 12 goals can mean 12 shots on target - it's attacking dominance people want from their champions - which you'll get a good schooling in once you fix up a date for the SMFA. ;o)

 
 
previous next