Search:

<< >>
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

view by post / day / month

posts
my descent into madness 3/29/2003
prisoner 3/27/2003
a new stereophonic sound spectacular 3/26/2003
chelsea, chelsea, chelsea 3/25/2003
one liner 3/21/2003
vengeance (abridged) 3/21/2003
can we? 3/19/2003
we're involved in craziness 3/19/2003
black and white crystal ball 3/17/2003
handy dandy 3/17/2003
more science babble 3/7/2003
do you remember what the music meant? 3/7/2003
random number generators 3/4/2003
giddyup 3/3/2003

previous next
 
 
more science babble 3:03pm 3/7/2003  

Revisiting my consideration of random number generators in the context of shuffling songs in mp3 players, i found a nice summary of random number generation. I would imagine that Winamp employs a linear congruential generators of the type Xn+1 = (aXn + c) mod m, which means that it generates a random number series in which the next number in the sequence is calculated deterministically from the number before it. Such series have interesting properties that relate back to my observations of Winamp's randomness, particularly when the constants a, c, and m are not selected wisely. Moreover, i found that Winamp has an option that lets you select the "shuffle window size", which supposedly dictates the percentage of the playlist that is shuffled over. I had it set at 33% for some reason, which may further explain why Winamp appeared to be randomly-challenged. This shuffle window size bears striking similarities to the properties of the constant m above. However, i can't imagine why you would want to restrict the number of songs over which Winamp shuffles.

last edited 3:03pm 3/7/2003 back to top
 
 
 
 
 
do you remember what the music meant? 11:07am 3/7/2003  

Last night Veronica and i braved the driving snow (although by 7pm, it was not so much driving as it was faltering) and headed over towards Fenway and the Avalon to see Interpol and The Raveonettes. Also playing was Lifestyle, who have now opened for Interpol in Boston twice with their ultra-dated synth pop, but we timed our arrival comfortably after they finished performing. The Raveonettes, a Danish drone rock outfit, excelled in their thumping bass, wall of sound approach. I thoroughly enjoyed their set, although at times i couldn't help but feel they were the second coming of the Jesus and Mary Chain (or third coming, if you count B.R.M.C., or fourth or fifth coming if you count the several incarnations of the actual Jesus and Mary Chain). Still quite good though, definitely more interesting than the aforementioned B.R.M.C.'s indie kid-friendly version. I was particularly taken with the feedback-laden atonal rendition of Buddy Holly's "Rollercoaster" that opened and closed the set.

Our last experience with Interpol, at the Middle East in September, was somewhat lackluster, but i was willing to give them another chance to impress live. The opening song, "Untitled", did not instill me with confidence. This is probably my favorite song on their debut record Turn On The Bright Lights, a four minute, mostly instrumental number that centers on a delicate guitar piece offset by the lull of the bass, rising and falling with the drums and more visceral effects from the second guitarist. On record it has a certain emotion and resonance, but live the effects of the second guitar are removed (it plays a pointless backing track mirroring the first guitar) and the whole composition is destroyed. Some other songs sounded okay, notably "Stella Was A Diver And She Was Always Down", but the experience lacks a vitality present on the record. "PDA", their indie hit, sounded really awful. After seeing them twice, my conclusion is that whoever produced their record must be really talented. Moreover, the similarities to Joy Division that i initially dismissed are beginning to tick me off. The singer's channeling of Ian Curtis is undeniable, however it is not aided by the driving bass of a Peter Hook and its potential power falls flat. Nonetheless, the Avalon was sold out and the crowd was lapping it up, so any predictions i might harbor about their imminent fall from indie grace may only be hopeful.

last edited 11:07am 3/7/2003 back to top
 
 
previous next